Physician and patient benefit–risk preferences from two randomized long-acting injectable antipsychotic trials

Physician and patient benefit–risk preferences from two randomized long-acting injectable antipsychotic trials

Blog Article

Eva G Katz,1 Brett Hauber,2 Srihari Gopal,3 Angie Fairchild,2 Amy Pugh,4 Rachel B Weinstein,3 Bennett S Levitan3 1Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ, 2RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, 3Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, 4The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), CA, USA Purpose: To quantify clinical trial participants’ and investigators’ judgments with respect to the relative importance read more of efficacy and safety attributes of antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia, and to assess the impact of formulation and adherence.Methods: Discrete-choice experiment surveys were completed by patients with schizophrenia and physician investigators participating in two phase-3 clinical trials of paliperidone palmitate 3-month long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic.Respondents were asked to choose between hypothetical antipsychotic profiles defined by efficacy, safety, and mode of administration.Data were analyzed using random-parameters logit and probit models.

Results: Patients (N=214) and physicians (N=438) preferred complete improvement in positive symptoms (severe to none) as the most important attribute, compared with improvement in any other attribute studied.Both respondents preferred 3-month and 1-month injectables to oral formulation (P<0.05), irrespective of prior adherence to oral antipsychotic treatment, with physicians showing greater preference for a 3-month over a 1-month LAI for nonadherent patients.Physicians were willing to accept treatments with reduced efficacy for patients with prior poor adherence.

The maximum decrease in efficacy (95% confidence interval [CI]) that physicians would accept for switching a patient from daily oral to 3-month injectable was as follows: adherent: 9.8% (95% CI: 7.2–12.4), 20% nonadherent: 25.

4% (95% CI: 21.0–29.9), and 50% nonadherent: >30%.For patients, adherent: 10.

1% (95% CI: 6.1–14.1), nonadherent: the change in efficacy 3 piece horse wall art studied was regarded as unimportant.Conclusion: Improvement in positive symptoms was the most important attribute.

Patients and physicians preferred LAIs over oral antipsychotics, with physicians showing a greater preference for 3-month over 1-month LAI.Physicians and patients were willing to accept reduced efficacy in exchange for switching a patient from an oral formulation to a LAI.Keywords: benefit–risk assessment, long-acting injectable, patient preference, physician preference, schizophrenia, survey.